MLP negotiations
+4
-space-
true_illusion
Carsear
ceaser angus
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
MLP negotiations
I formally started negotiation NAP with MLP on 8/10
This is just round 1. final terms won't look like this but here is what I send Mobros. Please do not interfere with negotiations. You should be posting as many CRs as possible.
Greetings Mobros,
I would like to start the painfully slow process of negotiating a NAP.
We propose these terms.
1. MLP apologizes for multi-attacks on Ha Ha even after warned not to.
2. MLP apologizes for threats of total war against Ha Ha.
3. MLP must send ONLY 3700 archers and 300 cooks up against a city wall of our choosing.
4. Scottw must donate 50k wood to True Illusion and only post winning CRs of substantial loot or out damaging opponent.
5. NAP of 15 days.
I can negotiate some of these and we can talk more about the NAP date when your ready.
This is just round 1. final terms won't look like this but here is what I send Mobros. Please do not interfere with negotiations. You should be posting as many CRs as possible.
Greetings Mobros,
I would like to start the painfully slow process of negotiating a NAP.
We propose these terms.
1. MLP apologizes for multi-attacks on Ha Ha even after warned not to.
2. MLP apologizes for threats of total war against Ha Ha.
3. MLP must send ONLY 3700 archers and 300 cooks up against a city wall of our choosing.
4. Scottw must donate 50k wood to True Illusion and only post winning CRs of substantial loot or out damaging opponent.
5. NAP of 15 days.
I can negotiate some of these and we can talk more about the NAP date when your ready.
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
Good start, I particularly like the archers part.. :-)
ceaser angus- Leader
- Number of posts : 399
Age : 53
Registration date : 2009-01-19
Re: MLP negotiations
They'll need at least one ram or they'll scatter after a few rounds when they "realize they can't break the wall"
Carsear- Gunsman
- Number of posts : 120
Age : 64
Registration date : 2009-06-30
Re: MLP negotiations
pick someone else for him to send the wood too, or get a GO to approve it otherwise i will get banned for pushing.
true_illusion- Swordsman
- Number of posts : 46
Registration date : 2010-06-08
Re: MLP negotiations
Have them send the wood to Vella or Kylenatory..
ceaser angus- Leader
- Number of posts : 399
Age : 53
Registration date : 2009-01-19
Re: MLP negotiations
They have only commented negatively on each term. They did not propose new or amended terms. I responded with my own comments and amended terms (more in their favor).
I think we could also just post that we have ended the war. MLP has been reduced to nothing. They don't fight back or respond to PMs. Quite frankly, they are asleep. What do you think. Could we end the war because we are bored?
I think we could also just post that we have ended the war. MLP has been reduced to nothing. They don't fight back or respond to PMs. Quite frankly, they are asleep. What do you think. Could we end the war because we are bored?
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
Read from bottom up.
I did counter in my previous message - with the original terms we agreed upon. My current response to your latest terms follows:
We will not apologize. Non-negotiable. We're neither wrong nor embarrassed.
You didn't say anything about 1v1 until after we retaliated against Dave, and then it was as your excuse as to why more HaHa jumped in.
If you are referring to MCB's message - he was warning that continued actions could result in war. I've seen the message and it was clearly not threatening.
You already gave up Dave's position as general in your agreement with RumR, so I don't know why you're trying to offer it to me now.
So basically, that leaves us agreeing only on the NAP. We still want protection for our smaller members (35K & under) from Dave, seeing as how that's what started everything.
On the 13.08.2010 13:12 brbdc wrote:
> Sorry for the bud comment. I dont know you behind the name Mobros but nice to meet you.
>
> You are completely missing the point of the terms. We gave terms, you counter, not comment. You DoW'ed us and got your butt kicked. We are thinking of just posting that the war is done because your alliance has almost completely gave up.
>
> The terms are admissions of wrong and in some cases embarrassment to show their mistake.
>
> Here are some amended terms.
>
> 1. MLP apologizes for multi-attacks on Ha Ha even after warned not to. This one stands. I never gave you go ahead in multi-attacks. I said do what you want 1v1. You ignored this.
>
> 2. MLP apologizes for threats of total war against Ha Ha. This one happens on the boards. Because you made this one public on the boards, this one has to be done to save face.
>
> 3. MLP must send ONLY 3700 archers and 300 cooks up against a city wall of our choosing.
> This one is for humor and satisfaction. You got your butts kicked in this war. We want a funny CR to post with the end of the war. This is still negotiable.
>
> 4. Scottw is an idiot for the things he says. We will remove this and put in a more favorable one for you.
> BigGayDave is removed from General in Ha Ha.
>
> 5. NAP of 15 days.
>
>
> On the 13.08.2010 2:39 Mobros wrote:
> > First of all, I'm a girl. Not a big deal, but when people start calling me things like "bud" I feel the need to correct them. Anyway. Here's my response to each of your terms.
> >
> > 1. We weren't warned not to, in fact when I told you we were going to retaliate you basically said okay
> > 2. It was a warning not a threat
> > 3. don't see the point of this
> > 4. Scott doesn't post ridiculous CRs like Ha-Ha has
> > 5. I'm fine with a NAP, but we are also aware Dave immediately broke the one y'all had with RumR
> >
> > You want to settle this quickly, my suggestion is to certify the original terms you and I (and your council) agreed on. Regards, Mobros
I did counter in my previous message - with the original terms we agreed upon. My current response to your latest terms follows:
We will not apologize. Non-negotiable. We're neither wrong nor embarrassed.
You didn't say anything about 1v1 until after we retaliated against Dave, and then it was as your excuse as to why more HaHa jumped in.
If you are referring to MCB's message - he was warning that continued actions could result in war. I've seen the message and it was clearly not threatening.
You already gave up Dave's position as general in your agreement with RumR, so I don't know why you're trying to offer it to me now.
So basically, that leaves us agreeing only on the NAP. We still want protection for our smaller members (35K & under) from Dave, seeing as how that's what started everything.
On the 13.08.2010 13:12 brbdc wrote:
> Sorry for the bud comment. I dont know you behind the name Mobros but nice to meet you.
>
> You are completely missing the point of the terms. We gave terms, you counter, not comment. You DoW'ed us and got your butt kicked. We are thinking of just posting that the war is done because your alliance has almost completely gave up.
>
> The terms are admissions of wrong and in some cases embarrassment to show their mistake.
>
> Here are some amended terms.
>
> 1. MLP apologizes for multi-attacks on Ha Ha even after warned not to. This one stands. I never gave you go ahead in multi-attacks. I said do what you want 1v1. You ignored this.
>
> 2. MLP apologizes for threats of total war against Ha Ha. This one happens on the boards. Because you made this one public on the boards, this one has to be done to save face.
>
> 3. MLP must send ONLY 3700 archers and 300 cooks up against a city wall of our choosing.
> This one is for humor and satisfaction. You got your butts kicked in this war. We want a funny CR to post with the end of the war. This is still negotiable.
>
> 4. Scottw is an idiot for the things he says. We will remove this and put in a more favorable one for you.
> BigGayDave is removed from General in Ha Ha.
>
> 5. NAP of 15 days.
>
>
> On the 13.08.2010 2:39 Mobros wrote:
> > First of all, I'm a girl. Not a big deal, but when people start calling me things like "bud" I feel the need to correct them. Anyway. Here's my response to each of your terms.
> >
> > 1. We weren't warned not to, in fact when I told you we were going to retaliate you basically said okay
> > 2. It was a warning not a threat
> > 3. don't see the point of this
> > 4. Scott doesn't post ridiculous CRs like Ha-Ha has
> > 5. I'm fine with a NAP, but we are also aware Dave immediately broke the one y'all had with RumR
> >
> > You want to settle this quickly, my suggestion is to certify the original terms you and I (and your council) agreed on. Regards, Mobros
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
what were these orginal terms supposedly agreed upon by our council and them?
true_illusion- Swordsman
- Number of posts : 46
Registration date : 2010-06-08
Re: MLP negotiations
na fuck em.... 30 day NAP only, They remove all proxys 24hrs before it goes into effect no exceptions, they apologize for being a bunch duesch bags for not being able to fight there own battles. I do agree that we need to set some limits as to what we call a farm. Basically no one under 35k may be farmed thats fair to me
ceaser angus- Leader
- Number of posts : 399
Age : 53
Registration date : 2009-01-19
Re: MLP negotiations
i say we just leave them.... let them declare the war 365 days if they want to. Let them whine on the boards. But before we leave them alonecoz of their incapacity to wage a war, lets leave the Theta boards the FACTS: we should post screenshots of their islands being occupied. All large battles with MLP should be posted in the Hall of Fame....for everyone to see. they may twist the war but they cannot cover the facts.
*The CR's speak for themselves. We owned their islands....
*(They did not win any of the large battles we had.
*Their island cores were all occupied by us.
*They declared war to us but we took the war to them, which should be the other way around.
*They just run around their towns hiding when they see us on the attack. *Rumr is a better opponent than them.
but i do agree that farming 35k players has to stop. even if they want to build hideouts and large armies.... these small players just cannot.
i can post the HOF battles and screenshots of MLP islands getting owned. just send me the CR.
*The CR's speak for themselves. We owned their islands....
*(They did not win any of the large battles we had.
*Their island cores were all occupied by us.
*They declared war to us but we took the war to them, which should be the other way around.
*They just run around their towns hiding when they see us on the attack. *Rumr is a better opponent than them.
but i do agree that farming 35k players has to stop. even if they want to build hideouts and large armies.... these small players just cannot.
i can post the HOF battles and screenshots of MLP islands getting owned. just send me the CR.
-space-- Pirate King
- Number of posts : 711
Registration date : 2009-01-18
Re: MLP negotiations
I have agreement on these terms.
30 day NAP
Ban on attacking players below 25k. Applies to active, tagged players only. (both alliances)
Peace Treaty with Ha Ha, Jr (training alliance).
Ha Ha pledge of non-interference in other MLP wars. This applies to MLP and other alliances.
MLP apologizes for threat of total war.
Ha Ha apologizes for bullying of small MLP players.
I need you guys to decide in the next few hours, otherwise, I will put it in effect.
War ends Noon on Friday. (Game Time)
MWC and floaters must be pulled by Thurs Noon. (Game Time)
Please respond asap.
30 day NAP
Ban on attacking players below 25k. Applies to active, tagged players only. (both alliances)
Peace Treaty with Ha Ha, Jr (training alliance).
Ha Ha pledge of non-interference in other MLP wars. This applies to MLP and other alliances.
MLP apologizes for threat of total war.
Ha Ha apologizes for bullying of small MLP players.
I need you guys to decide in the next few hours, otherwise, I will put it in effect.
War ends Noon on Friday. (Game Time)
MWC and floaters must be pulled by Thurs Noon. (Game Time)
Please respond asap.
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
I like all of it except for us apologizing for "bulling".........
ceaser angus- Leader
- Number of posts : 399
Age : 53
Registration date : 2009-01-19
Re: MLP negotiations
Those seem pretty good to me..
Although I want revenge on creamaid for getting me while i was on vacation.. >.<
Although I want revenge on creamaid for getting me while i was on vacation.. >.<
Ranger Will- Slinger
- Number of posts : 24
Age : 35
Registration date : 2010-06-08
Re: MLP negotiations
well, the bulling part is a lil of.. its their DoW no?
Jusu- Archer
- Number of posts : 93
Registration date : 2009-07-01
Re: MLP negotiations
Apology for bullying is a compromise. We get apologies from them. They get apologies. It allows us to build up for next war and keep flaming on threads down. Its all just for compromise. Next time there is DoW, it wont be for bullying. It will be for something else and then no one will care about bullying statement. It will be archived and forgotten.
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
I'm fine with it just don't really like the apologizing for bullying though but I'll deal with it lol
Redneck0025- Steam Giant
- Number of posts : 154
Age : 44
Registration date : 2010-01-06
Re: MLP negotiations
well, i'm not super objecting or anything, but just to go by it - they apologize for threats of war, which they started anyhow..
i don't mind apologizing that the cases of bullying did take place, when perhaps they should not, but to put that whole haha is supposed to admit we were bullying their small players, and on top of that be sorry for it ... well, it kinda sounds they were right in the first place to go with those threats and war, doesn't it?
i don't mind apologizing that the cases of bullying did take place, when perhaps they should not, but to put that whole haha is supposed to admit we were bullying their small players, and on top of that be sorry for it ... well, it kinda sounds they were right in the first place to go with those threats and war, doesn't it?
Jusu- Archer
- Number of posts : 93
Registration date : 2009-07-01
Re: MLP negotiations
Would you rather no one apologizes for anything. We dont apologize for bullying and they dont apologize for acts of war.
Guest- Guest
Re: MLP negotiations
what if we said we as an alliance apologize for the players that attacked the smaller players? just an idea
Redneck0025- Steam Giant
- Number of posts : 154
Age : 44
Registration date : 2010-01-06
Re: MLP negotiations
Cut the nap to 14 days, just my opinion but everyone in the alliance knows i am notoriously famous for not wanting any peace treaties or NAP's
And my apology would be worded "I am sorry MLP thinks that HaHa are bullies"
And my apology would be worded "I am sorry MLP thinks that HaHa are bullies"
true_illusion- Swordsman
- Number of posts : 46
Registration date : 2010-06-08
Re: MLP negotiations
i would rather have no apologies from either side....though i am fine with the rest of the terms.
-space-- Pirate King
- Number of posts : 711
Registration date : 2009-01-18
Re: MLP negotiations
sorry for disappearing, my computer decided to break... again. My towns ran out of wine.
nowhale- Doctor
- Number of posts : 232
Age : 37
Registration date : 2010-05-18
Re: MLP negotiations
nowhale wrote:sorry for disappearing, my computer decided to break... again. My towns ran out of wine.
Stop watching porn on it
true_illusion- Swordsman
- Number of posts : 46
Registration date : 2010-06-08
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|